%tracker%

January, 2010


Copyright ©2010 Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc.
 All rights reserved. View our copyright policy.

 

Competency Checkup: What’s in it for you?

Do you dread your annual evaluation? Does it make you anxious to have your technique scrutinized? There are many reasons you should welcome the experience, and embrace what it means to your professional stature.

By having your work performance formally assessed on a routine basis, you create for yourself and your employer documentation that places you in a favorable light. You may already be great at what you do, but is it documented that you consistently collect blood samples according to established standards? If not, you might not be able to prove your expertise if your knowledge and technique were ever called into question.

Like an annual physical examination that determines the current status of your health, regular competency assessment activities serve as a checkup of your current knowledge and skill as a phlebotomist. Checkups have two purposes: to either verify all is well or to spot and address problems early on.

Assessment Methods
For the most comprehensive employee evaluation, a variety of assessment methods should be used. Four commonly used methods are described below:

  • Direct observation—This method of assessment typically employs a standardized checklist that guides the evaluator’s review of the employee’s actual performance of phlebotomy procedures in the workplace. Such checklists also serve as a great self-assessment tool for employees prior to their formal evaluation. When checklists are shared with staff in this manner, anxiety about the process is lessened and performance expectations are clearly communicated.
  • Written test—Because it may not always be possible to observe every activity you are assigned to perform, administering a written test is an effective way to measure the employee’s breadth of knowledge on a variety of topics and familiarity with infrequently performed tasks.
  • Case studies/Problem solving—Case studies are particularly useful for addressing problem-prone or high-risk activities. Presenting scenarios for the employee to interpret that are based on actual or likely occurrences reveals an employee’s thought processes and helps ensure that appropriate action is taken should such situations be encountered in the future.
  • Oral queries—More informal than the other assessment methods listed above, conducting a verbal Q&A session can overcome reading or language barriers an employee may have and is useful for reassessing employees who require retraining or additional follow up. Just make sure records of such oral evaluations are kept.

Frequency
After initial training is complete and prior to working independently, the competence of new or newly trained employees should be assessed by a qualified individual. In addition, when a new procedure or collection method is introduced, the competence of all involved staff should be measured prior to implementation. As a rule of thumb, it’s a good idea for employee competence to be evaluated every three to six months the first year, and annually thereafter. 

Tips for Successful Assessments
To establish an effective and robust competence program, supervisors should consider the following:

  • Provide thorough initial training and ongoing phlebotomy continuing education;
  • Keep blood collection policy and procedure manuals up to date;
  • Use a variety of assessment tools and methods;
  • Encourage employee self-assessments;
  • Document all training and assessment activities;
  • Obtain staff input on the process and provide feedback on performance;
  • Implement corrective action, as appropriate;
  • Ensure a qualified individual conducts and documents all assessment activities.

Each January, many of us participate in the New Year’s ritual of making resolutions. So for 2010, why not resolve to be the best phlebotomist you can be? Annual evaluations won’t automatically protect an employee from legal liability should a patient injury occur, but when a facility shows it’s serious about maintaining competent personnel, it can only help. So, if having your phlebotomy skills evaluated makes you feel ill, consider the process as an insurance policy that helps protect your credibility and career by proving you’re fit to perform the task.   

[Editor’s Note: a sample competency checklist is included in the Center for Phlebotomy Education’s Manager’s Toolbox.]

Feel free to forward this newsletter to a friend!
If this issue was forwarded to you from a friend, subscribe here.

Center Posts Free Hemolysis Article

In keeping with our tradition of providing high-quality technical content for free, the Center for Phlebotomy Education recently uploaded a new Needle Know-How article on its web site. “The Art of Hemolysis” discusses how cells ruptured during sample collection and handling can significantly alter test results, especially potassium levels. The most common causes of hemolysis are listed along with preventative measures specimen-collection personnel can take. A link to the free article appears on the Center’s home page at www.phlebotomy.com.

 

This Month in Phlebotomy Today

Here’s what subscribers to Phlebotomy Today, the Center for Phlebotomy Education’s paid-subscription newsletter currently in its 11th year of publication, are reading about this month:

  • Feature Article: How Creativity Corrupts Phlebotomy
  • Phlebotomy in the News: a round-up of articles on phlebotomy and phlebotomists who made Internet headlines in December including these stories:
    • Patients Requesting HCWs to Wash Hands
    • Physicians Lax in Reporting Needlesticks
    • Healthcare Workers Spreading HIV to Patients
    • Keillor Slams Outpatient Drawing Center
    • Quest Responds to Keillor Comment
    • Phlebotomist Buying Groceries Performs CPR on Cashier
    • “A Voice for Patients” Spotlights Medical Errors
  • According to the Standards: Reusing needles
  • Tip of the Month: They're Called Stress Balls for a Reason
  • CEU questions (institutional version only).

Buy this issue for only $9.95.

For subscription rates and to subscribe to Phlebotomy Today, click here. The current month’s issue will be emailed to you immediately upon subscribing.

 

Featured FAQ
Hemolysis and IV draws

Q: Our nurses start an IV, they attach a tube holder and draw a red top. We’re finding these specimens frequently hemolyzed. Is hemolysis expected in this circumstance?

A: Vascular access devices are notorious for hemolyzing red blood cells. Every facility that draws blood during an IV start has a hemolysis problem. Guaranteed. The best way to prevent hemolysis is to avoid using an IV for the purpose of drawing blood. Statistics show they’re 10 times more likely to hemolyze a specimen than drawing by venipuncture. 

Even though IV cannulas may be of the same gauge as a blood collection needle, they’re not made for drawing blood. Therefore, they have a design that doesn’t consider the fragility of red blood cells. We know that the interior of a blood collection needle is smooth and without interruption, but assuming the same for any other vascular access device is overly presumptuous.

Each month, PT-STAT! will publish an excerpt from our newly released book Blood Specimen Collection FAQs. For a preview and for information on obtaining your copy, click here.

 

Featured Product
Phlebotomy Today

Phlebotomy Today-STAT! subscribers who are hungry for more in-depth articles and a wider variety of news and information on blood collection can now subscribe to its parent newsletter Phlebotomy Today at a discounted rate. The Center for Phlebotomy Education, publisher of the Phlebotomy Today family of e-newsletters, is reducing the single-user subscription from $99 to $79 through the month of January. (New subscribers only.)

Phlebotomy Today, the Center's flagship newsletter, was launched in 2000 and quickly gained a readership of thousands worldwide who have relied on the publication to keep current with the latest news and trends in the blood sample collection industry. In January of 2007, PT-STAT! was launched as a free spinoff of the popular publication.

Now in its 11th year of publication, Phlebotomy Today remains the world's only monthly publication dedicated exclusively to blood collection news and information. This special offer is available to new Phlebotomy Today subscribers only, and expires on January 31. Subscribing online at this special rate is not available. To subscribe at this special rate, contact the Center for Phlebotomy Education at support@phlebotomy.com or call toll free 866-857-9857.

Phlebotomy Today

 

Survey Says

Our latest survey asked Phlebotomy Today STAT! readers three questions about their use of blood collection devices.  The results are as follows:

Do you ever use non-safety needles for venipunctures (i.e., those without safety features)?

Yes:  11.4%
No:  88.6%

A sample comment:  “The only non-safety needle we ever use is our 25-gauge needle. It's great for doing venous draws on very difficult veins and infants. It's a 5/8" needle, which is nice and short for those tiny veins. I haven't been able to find a replacement I like w/the safety feature in this size needle, the only reason I continue using it. All our other needles have safety features. I hate the fact I can't let these 25-gauge needles go, I've tried and nothing else seems to work as good.”

Do you ever use non-retractable skin puncture devices?

Yes:  25.7%
No:  74.3%

Do you reuse tube holders?

Yes:  17.1%
No:  82.9%

Sample comments:

  • “Not any more. just stared one time use then throw them away. we had to many needle sticks. i'm, in long term care i do like this better.”
  • “I have a coworkder who does reuse the tube holders. She only carries one on her tray.”

Readers should keep in mind that an answer of “Yes” to any of the three questions posed places the collector at greater risk for occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens and in the U.S. represents a direct violation of OSHA regulations. Healthcare workers in other countries are no less vulnerable to accidental exposures, and should take precautions voluntarily to reduce their risk.

This month’s survey question: Does your facility formally evaluate competence of all staff who performs phlebotomy procedures? If so, how frequently are competency evaluations conducted and what methods are used?

 

Feel free to forward this newsletter to a friend!
If this issue was forwarded to you from a friend, subscribe here

What Would You Do?

Each month, What Would You Do? presents a different case study, then asks readers to contribute their ideas as to how each situation would best be handled. The following month, selected responses will be chosen by the editor and published (sender will be identified by first name and state only). The most accurate, well written response will receive a free download from the Center for Phlebotomy Education’s To the Point® library of articles. The exercise will conclude with a review of the selected submissions and a discussion of the standards pertinent to the case study.

 

Last Month’s Case Study:
Rough and Ready

You walk into your next patient's room, introduce yourself, and state your purpose. The patient brings his arm out of the covers, extends it on the bed, and proclaims with conviction, “You get one shot. If you miss, I'll knock your lights out.” The anger in his eyes tells you he means it.
What would you do?

 

 

According to our respondents, this type of negative patient reaction is not uncommon. Of those who would encounter patients with this attitude toward blood specimen collection, 64% indicated that their approach would be to attempt to calm and reassure the patient. Many readers expressed that such patient hostility is often rooted in previous phlebotomy experiences gone bad. After reassuring the patient of their technical abilities, 36% stated they would then ask for the patient’s consent, while 36% would also offer the patient the option of having someone else perform the draw. 

However, 29% of our readers stated they would not attempt to persuade or draw the patient, with 21% noting they would inform the attending nurse or physician. Some readers expressed concern for their own personal safety (14%), while 7% of readers would apprise their supervisor of the situation. 
Reader comments included:

  • “I would definitely get someone else to come and try to stick this patient. I would not take a chance at harming myself with a violent patient. If no one else is available to stick the patient, I would talk to the nurse and /or doctor and see if he could be talked to and drawn at a later time.”
  • “You have been threatened. Offer him to choose someone else. Let supervisor know. Maybe the supervisor and security can talk to the patient.”
  • “All patients have the right to refuse treatment, including testing that doctors have ordered. If the patient is of legal age, and is not of diminished capacity, you must obey the patients wish and not draw on them. That is not to say, you cannot return in 1/2 hour or at the end of your rounds and try again.”

Because a patient’s cognitive status has great bearing on how he/she should be managed, those who perform blood specimen collection should be familiar with and follow their facility’s specific policies to ensure their own safety while respecting the rights of their patients.

 We particularly liked the response given by Kathleen D., of Arizona, below:
“I would tell the patient that I have 30+ years of phlebotomy experience, and probably say something like, “Have you had trouble when getting your blood drawn in the past?”  I’d ask if it was ok for me to apply the tourniquet and check for a vein.  I would assure him that if I were not completely sure that I could get the blood, I would not even attempt the stick.  My major job would be to find out why he was so angry/upset about blood draws, and try to calm his fears.  If it seemed as though he wouldn’t cooperate, I would not attempt the phlebotomy”.

For her detailed approach to diffuse a hostile situation and regain the patient’s trust, Kathleen will receive a free download from the Center for Phlebotomy Education’s To the Point® library of articles.

 

 

This Month’s Case Study:
Chatty Cathy

Your facility serves as a clinical site for phlebotomy students. One of your new students shows promise, but chats excessively with outpatients.
Patients compliment on her friendliness, but her socializing
is creating a backlog in the draw station waiting room.
What would you do?

 

Tell us what you'd do in this case. Submit your response by the 20 th of the month and send it to this address and this address only: WWYD@phlebotomy.com. Submissions sent to any other address will not be considered. Keep your suggested solutions less than 100 words. Although you don’t have to be an English scholar to be considered for inclusion, submission with proper grammar and punctuation will be given priority. If you’re not sure of the appropriate solution, check your facility’s procedure manual or ask your manager. Who knows, you might be presented with the very same dilemma tomorrow.

 

 

 

Feel free to forward this newsletter to a friend!

If this issue was forwarded to you from a friend, subscribe here to receive your own copy each month so that you never miss a single issue of the only free monthly newsletter on the planet devoted exclusively to blood specimen collection!

 

Newsletter Information:

PT STAT! is a free, monthly educational service provided by the Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc., the most respected authority in phlebotomy. For a complete company profile and product list for all healthcare professionals who perform, teach or manage specimen collection procedures, visit us on the Internet at: http://www.phlebotomy.com.
Do not respond to this email. Responding to the email address from which this newsletter is sent will result in the deletion of your address from our mailing list. If you would like to send an email to the editor, send it to phlebotomy@phlebotomy.com
For images to appear, you must be logged on to the Internet.
Having a problem with reading or receiving the newsletter? Your satisfaction is important to us. Let us know by sending an email to phlebotomy@phlebotomy.com
Interested in forwarding or reprinting content from PT STAT! ? Read our copyright policy at http://www.phlebotomy.com/Copyright-Policy.cpe

unsubscribe information: This email is sent to you because you have subscribed to PT-STAT! By subscribing, you agreed to receive no more than three emails per month including the monthly newsletter. If you would like to be removed from this list and no longer receive PT-STAT!, click here to unsubscribe. You may also unsubscribe by sending a request via postal mail. Please include your name, e-mail address and a printed copy of your newsletter. Send to:
Unsubscribe PT-STAT!
c/o Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc.
1304 N. Old Hwy 135, Ste. 103
Corydon, IN 47112
812-738-5700

Copyright 2010, Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Newsletters may contain links to sites on the Internet owned and operated by third parties. The Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc. is not responsible for the availability of, or the content located on or through, any such third-party site. Information in this document is provided "as is," without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and freedom from infringement. The user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and the use of this document. We will not be liable for any damages of any kind arising from the use of this information, including, but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, and consequential damages.