Fingersticks on Mastectomy Patients
Is it acceptable to perform fingersticks on the same side as a mastectomy? Is it acceptable to perform venipunctures on mastectomy patients if the patient gave permission? Answers to these commonly asked questions have their roots in the CLSI standards. The rule against drawing from the same side of a prior mastectomy is hard and fast: such draws require physician's permission. The risk is that the body's ability to fight an infection in the affected limb is compromised because of lymph node removal during mastectomy. Trauma and/or infection to the affected side can result in long-term lymphedema, which can lead to an attorney's three favorite words: pain and suffering.
Some argue that mastectomies are done with less removal of lymph nodes today than in the past, so there is less likelihood of complications from a venipuncture. That's true. The problem is that some mastectomies are still radical. It depends on the surgeon and the extent of the metastasis. How is the person who is about to draw blood from a mastectomy patient supposed to know?
It's not prudent for the phlebotomist to assume lymph nodes have been preserved. The standard for venipunctures published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), document H3, states physician's permission must be obtained before drawing on the same side of the mastectomy. The physician is in the best position to know the extent of lymph node removal, not the phlebotomist.
Because this rule is so prevalent in the literature, if a patient develops complications and seeks compensation, the facility doesn't have much of a legal leg to stand on. Even if the patient gives permission—verbal or in writing—it may not exonerate the facility should complications develop. If the patient provides permission, then sues for pain and suffering, her attorney can effectively argue that the patient was not aware of the risks involved, and was not in a position to give informed consent. Signed waivers may not be bullet proof.
Without a thorough knowledge of the standards, it's difficult to know the risk. Make sure you know the standards, and operate within them and according to your procedure manual at all times.
DenLine® Introduces New Lab Coat
DenLine® Uniforms, Inc., (Quincy, IL) introduced a new style of lab coat ideal for specimen collection and processing personnel. The DL176 Protective gown was introduced last month at the Clinical Laboratory Management Association (CLMA) conference and exhibition in Houston, Texas. Made of DenLine’s Protection Plus® splash & spray resistant fabric, the gown offers higher protection and comfort when compared with traditional front opening coats and meet OSHA’s Bloodborne Pathogens Standard requirements.
The gown is available in 41" length (pictured), sizes XS through 3XL, and come in White and Royal. For Information, contact Dennis Adams, DenLine Uniforms, Quincy, IL (800-336-5463).
This Month in Phlebotomy Today
For subscription rates and to subscribe to Phlebotomy Today, visit www.phlebotomy.com/PhlebotomyToday.html. The current month's issue will be emailed to you immediately upon subscribing.
Featured FAQ: Butterfly Overuse
Question: What are your thoughts on the high usage of tube holders with butterflies by specimen collection personnel who are required to draw blood? I keep thinking that if you have to use the butterfly, it's because the vein is too small/fragile for a tube-holder draw, so why would you put a vacuum at the end of the butterfly.
Response: Butterfly over-usage is a problem everywhere. I agree with you that they should be reserved for fragile veins and used with a syringe. If a tube holder can be used, there's no need for the butterfly in most cases. CLSI isn't going to stick their neck out and recommend when butterflies are appropriate and when they're not. They prefer safer territory and leave it up to the facilities to enforce conservative use of these devices.
I suspect your staff overuses them for the same reason everyone else does: they're very maneuverable, patients request them, and they require less of a steady hand to maintain placement during the draw. However, they are also associated with a high rate of accidental needlesticks (EPINet data). Perhaps you might recruit your infection control nurse to launch a campaign on appropriate use of butterflies, but you will still have to provide butterflies for those difficult geriatrics and pediatrics. That means they'll still be stocked and available for overuse. There's no way around this dilemma, I'm afraid. But if you could get the point across about butterflies and accidental needlesticks (no pun intended), you might be able to induce a behavioral change. I hope this helps.
Each month, PT-STAT! will publish one of the hundreds of phlebotomy FAQs in the growing database of questions and answers available in Phlebotomy Central, the members-only section of the Center for Phlebotomy Education's web site. For information on joining Phlebotomy Central, visit www.phlebotomy.com/PhlebotomyCentral.html.
Specimen Collection Safety: Sharps Disposal Units
Do you have a sharps disposal unit available at the point of use? Any pause in disposing a contaminated needle incorporates a dangerous delay into your routine. Sharps containers should be available at the point of use so that there is little or no delay from when the needle is removed from the patient until it is permanently disposed of. Healthcare workers who draw blood in long-term care facilities or patients' homes have a wide variety of sharps containers to choose from that can be taken from home to home for use at the patient's side.
Featured Product: Lab Week Items
PT-STAT! is a free, monthly educational service
provided by the Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc., the most respected
authority in phlebotomy. For a complete company profile and product list for
all healthcare professionals who perform, teach or manage specimen collection
procedures, visit us on the Internet at: http://www.phlebotomy.com.
Do not respond to this email. Responding to the email address from which this newsletter is sent will result in the deletion of your address from our mailing list. If you would like to send an email to the editor, send it to firstname.lastname@example.org
For images to appear, you must be logged on to the Internet.
Having a problem with reading or receiving the newsletter? Your satisfaction is important to us. Let us know by sending an email to email@example.com
Interested in forwarding or reprinting content from PT-STAT! ? Read our copyright policy at http://www.phlebotomy.com/copyright_policy.html
unsubscribe information:This email is sent to you because you have completed our online
subscription form. If you would like to be removed from this list and no
longer receive PT-STAT!, click
here to unsubscribe. You may also unsubscribe by sending a request via
postal mail. Please include your name, e-mail address and a printed copy of
your PT-STAT issue. Send to:
c/o Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc.
P.O. Box 161
Ramsey, IN 47166
Copyright 2007, Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Newsletters may contain links to sites on the Internet owned and operated by third parties. The Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc. is not responsible for the availability of, or the content located on or through, any such third-party site. Information in this document is provided "as is," without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and freedom from infringement. The user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and the use of this document. We will not be liable for any damages of any kind arising from the use of this information, including, but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, and consequential damages.